RWE U.S. Offshore announced on Thursday a $1.2 billion settlement with the Trump administration to terminate projects under development off the coasts of New York, California, and Louisiana. This agreement increases the total spent on such settlements to nearly $4 billion.
The company highlighted that these leases involved significant planning, investment, and collaboration with federal agencies. However, it concluded that permitting the projects was unfeasible in the near future. For $1.22 billion, RWE will abandon the leases, which could have generated around seven gigawatts of power—sufficient for more than five million homes. RWE no longer holds any U.S. offshore wind leases.
President Donald Trump, known for his opposition to wind energy, aims to prevent the construction of wind turbines. His administration is buying back offshore wind leases to deter wind energy expansion, favoring fossil fuels instead. Offshore wind offers clean electricity, whereas burning oil, coal, and natural gas results in carbon emissions.
RWE plans to invest $900 million in a liquefied natural gas project in Louisiana and $300 million in natural gas turbines. The company is developing 15 natural gas projects in the U.S., and its headquarters are in Germany.
This strategy emerged after federal courts blocked Trump’s executive efforts to halt offshore wind development. With approximately $3.9 billion already spent on settlements, some states, including California, intend to sue over lost wind energy opportunities. Additionally, a coalition of renewable energy groups sued the Pentagon for failing to finish national security reviews for new onshore wind farms on private lands. A federal judge in Oregon ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, mandating the Defense Department to continue its reviews and update on progress.
Interior Secretary Doug Burgum expressed that Americans deserve an energy system based on practicality, not reliant on subsidies or technologies unable to satisfy current demand. He welcomed RWE’s agreement and their investment in projects enhancing energy security, providing reliable power, and maintaining affordable electricity.
However, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island criticized the administration’s lease buybacks as effectively paying companies to abandon clean energy for more costly fossil fuels, which could subsequently raise consumer costs. “They are creating a significant money drain, pulling billions from consumers,” he stated, calling it both a cost and corruption issue due to Trump’s ties with fossil fuel donors.
In March, TotalEnergies of France received nearly $1 billion—a refund of its offshore wind leases—on the condition that the money be reinvested in fossil fuels. Golden State Wind and Bluepoint Wind agreed in April to end their leases for reimbursements totaling nearly $900 million, with the same reinvestment condition. Invenergy, based in Chicago, agreed in June to terminate its four early-stage offshore wind leases in exchange for $765 million in reimbursements.
___
The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage is funded by multiple private foundations, but AP is solely responsible for its content. Find standards for collaboration, supporter lists, and funded coverage areas at AP.org.