A group of teachers unions leaders recently addressed Democratic governors in an open letter, urging them to refuse participation in a new federal tax-credit scholarship program. They argue this action is critical to safeguard public education. However, their argument overlooks the core intent of the law, which is not a zero-sum game. It does not promote vouchers as suggested; instead, it empowers parents to make educational choices for their children, irrespective of whether those choices involve public or private schools.
Parents are often most knowledgeable about their children’s needs. Education discussions have historically centered around institutions and political frameworks rather than individual children. While systems and funding are necessary topics, education is experienced by families one child at a time. For instance, a mother helping her son read isn’t considering political categories. Similarly, a father seeking a safer or nurturing environment for his daughter isn’t aiming to undermine public education. Parents searching for additional tutoring simply want better reading skills for their child, which could, in turn, bolster public education by enhancing outcomes reflective of the school’s performance.
Contrary to the letter’s claims, the tax-credit scholarship program does not serve private interests. Instead, it caters to children’s needs and is accessible to 90 percent of all children, including those in public schools. This approach doesn’t exclude any children or treat opportunity as an exclusive right. It recognizes that children across different school types may require support, which should be available to all families meeting the income criteria.
For over 25 years, our organization has observed that when families are entrusted with decisions, significant benefits emerge. Although scholarships may seem modest, they often represent the difference between fulfilling or not fulfilling a child’s needs.
The union leaders claim that offering families more choices could weaken public education. Nonetheless, supporting parents doesn’t constitute an attack on public schools. Refusing to provide families with options best suited for their children, or preventing public school parents from accessing additional resources, is not necessary to honor public education. Public schools are important, as are parents’ choices. Strong schools and the freedom for families to select the best options for their children both matter.
The governors’ decision should focus on whether they stand with families or allow funds to be diverted to states that have embraced the program. Trusting ordinary people to make crucial decisions for themselves and their loved ones has always been central to our nation, especially in education. Supporting parents respects their role as primary caretakers of their children’s welfare, benefiting society overall.
Darla M. Romfo is President and CEO of the Children’s Scholarship Fund, a national organization offering K-12 scholarships to over 38,000 families in the 2025-26 school year.