California’s Housing Affordability: Most and Least Affordable Areas Examined

California’s Housing Affordability: Most and Least Affordable Areas Examined

California has a mix of high-priced housing, including luxurious compounds owned by Silicon Valley magnates near Stanford University and exclusive beach properties in Malibu. However, in elite areas of the state, high housing prices are balanced by high salaries among residents. Conversely, homes in urban areas undergoing gentrification tend to be less expensive, but may still be too costly for long-time residents who lived there before the boom.

The Los Angeles Times aimed to rank cities and towns across California by affordability. They used the ratio of average home price to median household income level. This metric reveals how many years of income it would take to buy a median home in a particular area. In California’s most affordable regions, an average earner would need about four years’ worth of income to purchase a home, while in the least affordable areas, buyers would require 14 years of pretax income.

Most Affordable Locations

Affordable cities in California are often located far from major job centers, mainly within the Central Valley.

“In the Central Valley, it’s just much easier to build than anywhere else in California,” said Richard Green, director and chair of the USC Lusk Center for Real Estate. With abundant land, differing regulations, and primarily single-family home markets, the housing supply is notably higher relative to demand.

Green highlighted that in these locations, incomes are typical for California but home prices are lower, reducing the ratio of cost to income. Below are the most affordable cities or census designations by the ratio of median home value to median income according to the 2024 data from the Census Bureau (minimum population 20,000).

  • East Niles
    Median Home Value: $251,500
    Median Income: $55,124
    Years of Income to Reach Home Value: 4.56
    Population: 28,532
    East Niles is known for its low-priced housing but entails a challenging commute to the L.A. area.
  • Tulare
    Median Home Value: $329,800
    Median Income: $72,410
    Home Value to Income Ratio: 4.55
    Population: 70,945
    Tulare is nestled in Central Valley farmland, featuring historic downtown antique stores.
  • Visalia
    Median Home Value: $371,500
    Median Income: $81,989
    Home Value to Income Ratio: 4.53
    Population: 143,939
    Visalia is known for its desirable downtown and minor league baseball team.
  • Delano
    Median Home Value: $301,900
    Median Income: $67,010
    Home Value to Income Ratio: 4.51
    Population: 51,679
    Delano features agriculture as an economic driver and a rich history with United Farm Workers.
  • Rosamond
    Median Home Value: $352,600
    Median Income: $79,386
    Home Value to Income Ratio: 4.44
    Population: 21,473
    Rosamond offers proximity to L.A. and a residential development with an airport.
  • Twentynine Palms
    Median Home Value: $268,200
    Median Income: $62,554
    Home Value to Income Ratio: 4.29
    Population: 27,355
    Twentynine Palms has become a popular destination during the pandemic.
  • Imperial
    Median Home Value: $360,900
    Median Income: $90,195
    Home Value to Income Ratio: 4.00
    Population: 21,430
    Imperial is nationally recognized for its battle against a data center construction.
  • Corcoran
    Median Home Value: $236,100
    Median Income: $59,905
    Home Value to Income Ratio: 3.94
    Population: 22,491
    Corcoran’s economy revolves around agriculture and nearby prison complexes.
  • Lemoore
    Median Home Value: $328,300
    Median Income: $83,724
    Home Value to Income Ratio: 3.92
    Population: 27,102
    Lemoore hosts the Naval Weapons Station and the Tachi Palace Casino Resort.
  • Ridgecrest
    Median Home Value: $253,900
    Median Income: $89,250
    Home Value to Income Ratio: 2.84
    Population: 28,225
    Ridgecrest became known after a 2019 earthquake and is powered by the China Lake Air Force Base.

Least Affordable Locations

In California, coastal views and upscale communities represent premium prices, particularly linked to industries like technology and entertainment.

“Being on a coast is more expensive. It just is,” Green stated.

Below are the least affordable cities, by the ratio of median home value to median income from the 2024 Census Bureau data:

  • San Luis Obispo
    Median Home Value: $935,100
    Median Income: $73,685
    Home Value to Income Ratio: 12.69
    Population: 48,491
    This Central Coast college town faces challenges in home affordability despite a smaller size.
  • Arcadia
    Median Home Value: $1,441,800
    Median Income: $113,516
    Home Value to Income Ratio: 12.70
    Population: 55,170
    Arcadia offers amenities like safe streets and excellent schools but faces political scrutiny.
  • Newport Beach
    Median Home Value: $2,000,001
    Median Income: $156,867
    Home Value to Income Ratio: 12.75
    Population: 83,845
    Newport Beach’s oceanfront locations and luxury shopping contribute to high property values.
  • South Pasadena
    Median Home Value: $1,640,000
    Median Income: $127,175
    Home Value to Income Ratio: 12.90
    Population: 26,068
    Known for tree-lined streets and award-winning schools, South Pasadena is prime real estate.
  • Westmont
    Median Home Value: $653,800
    Median Income: $50,509
    Home Value to Income Ratio: 12.94
    Population: 34,123
    This area in South Los Angeles experiences rapid real estate price increases.
  • Berkeley
    Median Home Value: $1,413,900
    Median Income: $108,092
    Home Value to Income Ratio: 13.08
    Population: 120,257
    Once known for its free speech movement, Berkeley now demands high real estate prices.
  • Laguna Beach
    Median Home Value: $2,000,001
    Median Income: $143,843
    Home Value to Income Ratio: 13.90
    Population: 28,532
    Laguna Beach is an art-centered coastal town, with homes topping $2 million.
  • Santa Barbara
    Median Home Value: $1,570,800
    Median Income: $106,182
    Home Value to Income Ratio: 14.79
    Population: 87,779
    Though housing is expensive, Santa Barbara has a challenging commute to L.A.
  • Beverly Hills
    Median Home Value: $2,000,001
    Median Income: $132,977
    Home Value to Income Ratio: 15.04
    Population: 31,624
    The glamorous Beverly Hills has soaring real estate prices and is a symbol of wealth.
  • Santa Monica
    Median Home Value: $1,755,500
    Median Income: $114,885
    Home Value to Income Ratio: 15.28
    Population: 91,169
    At the top of the list, Santa Monica has a desirable location despite income discrepancies.

Bay Area Housing Dynamics

The Bay Area, despite high home prices, isn’t as represented among least affordable locations. This is largely due to high incomes driven by the tech industry.

“Incomes are just incredibly high in the Bay Area,” Green noted, attributing it to the tech boom.

Long-time Owners Impact on Housing

Many Southern California residents bought homes in luxury areas decades ago and resisted selling, influencing the market dynamic.

“California has, I think, the slowest mobility of any state in the country,” Green commented. Long-time owners enjoy the benefits of Proposition 13, keeping property taxes low.

Understanding these dynamics offers insight into California’s complex housing market.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *