A forensic psychologist who previously warned about Bryan Kohberger’s plea agreement argues that prosecutors missed a crucial chance. They should have insisted that Kohberger fully explain the Idaho student murders before accepting his plea.
“It was a serious mistake by the DA’s office to enter this deal,” said Dr. Kris Mohandie, an expert on violent behavior. Kohberger, who avoided a potential death penalty, is serving four life sentences without parole and an additional 10 years.
Last month, Kohberger sought post-conviction relief, claiming ineffective counsel and asserting his innocence. Police found his DNA on a knife sheath at the crime scene, confirming his involvement in the murders during a plea hearing in July 2025.
Mohandie said prosecutors should have obtained a detailed confession from Kohberger, even if Latah County Prosecutor Bill Thompson doubted its truth. “It’s a weak excuse to say he would lie,” Mohandie stated. “Getting him to admit something would have limited his ability to change his story.”
This lack of a confession leaves Kohberger with room to contest the case and forces victims’ families to endure a retrial. “This was poorly designed, and at the end of the day, victims are re-traumatized,” Mohandie noted.
Kohberger’s behavior, including a handwritten petition and contacting the media, reflects a desire to outsmart the system. “His actions reveal a need for notoriety apart from escaping justice,” Mohandie said.
Kohberger’s version of events included calling a reporter from prison before filing his petition. Mohandie added, “He’s not unique, but he believes he is, which is common among such offenders.” He urged the public to avoid seeing killers as fascinating figures. “They are terrible people,” he concluded.