President Trump aimed to compel Iran to agree to U.S. demands for a peace agreement through threats and limited military actions.
Despite efforts, negotiations to finalize an agreement haven’t significantly altered Iran’s nuclear stance.
The deal under discussion may lead to the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, a key oil and gas route, blockaded since U.S.-Israeli attacks began in February. Yet, decisions on difficult issues might be postponed.
Initially, Trump demanded free passage through the Strait to halt the conflict. The aim was to lower gas prices by ensuring free flow of ships and easing domestic tensions over the war. However, Iran has maintained control over the Strait.
On April 13, the U.S. initiated a naval blockade of Iranian ports, which persists. American forces rerouted over 100 ships as part of this strategy.
In May, Trump launched “Project Freedom” to safeguard ships trapped by Iran’s blockade, allowing two to escape before halting the initiative the next day. Calls for European ally assistance were unheeded.
Trump threatened further actions against Iran but refrained from actual attacks. The conflict has been unpopular among Americans and affected oil and gas prices, straining U.S. Arab allies.
By late April, with an approaching deadline for Iran to accept U.S. terms, Trump extended the cease-fire, waiting for a conclusive agreement. He continued threats via Truth Social, including warnings like “the Clock is Ticking” for Iran.
Last week, Trump postponed an informal military measure against Iran at the request of Gulf Arab leaders, citing ongoing “serious negotiations.”
Experts suggest Iran’s leaders feel strengthened after the conflict, as the nation endured attempts to destabilize the Islamic Republic. Analysts state Iran’s capacity to affect global energy prices gives them bargaining power.
Aaron Boxerman reports on Israel and Gaza for The Times from his base in Jerusalem.