Fox News host Laura Ingraham has criticized the Smithsonian Institution for promoting what she describes as a divisive ‘activist agenda’ through ‘restorative history.’ Ingraham argues this approach negatively portrays America, pointing to National Museum of American History director Anthea Hartig’s testimony. The discussion included controversial exhibits such as alleged ‘fetish attire’ displays and the exclusion of pro-life history.
Ingraham questions the use of taxpayer funds for these museum programs. Recently, the Trump administration claimed to have found evidence that the Smithsonian violated federal nondiscrimination laws. A letter from the Department of the Interior (DOI) and the White House stated concerns over the Smithsonian’s institutional culture potentially violating these laws by creating a hostile work environment based on race, ethnicity, and other protected characteristics.
No specific evidence was included in the letter, and the DOI did not offer further details. A Fox News Digital investigation revealed that several leading figures at the Smithsonian advocate for diversity, equity, and inclusion, which the Trump administration has condemned as discriminatory. President Donald Trump accused the Smithsonian of being ‘OUT OF CONTROL’ on Truth Social, citing a bias toward progressive ideology in its historical presentation.
In 2025, Trump signed an executive order directing officials to remove ‘improper ideology’ from the museum. The order requires agencies to restore trust in the Smithsonian, threatening to withdraw support unless addressed. The Smithsonian Institution is currently reviewing a probe triggered by a White House letter urging reevaluation of content perceived as divisive or partisan. Liberals argue conservative criticism attempts to influence how history is publicly presented.
Conservatives urge changes at the Smithsonian, including addressing perceived bias, or risk losing federal support. The institution receives around $1 billion annually in federal funding. The DOI’s letter states that continued support cannot proceed under current museum leadership without changes.
The Smithsonian has yet to specify changes required by the administration but emphasized the need for executive leadership to address ideological concerns. With upcoming vacancies on the Smithsonian’s board of regents, the administration might use these opportunities to increase its influence.
The DOI has requested a meeting with Smithsonian representatives to discuss alleged bias and civil rights violations. At a July congressional hearing, Anthea Hartig stated that the museum documents American life comprehensively, allowing the public to draw its conclusions.
The Smithsonian declined to comment on the letter, and recent reports note that its curators often have backgrounds in liberal advocacy or Democratic politics. Even the Smithsonian-run National Zoo features information on diversity and gender equity.