California, known for its large population and innovation, faces significant challenges, including a severe housing shortage. This issue underscores the need for effective leadership in the state.
However, recent events reveal a lackluster lineup of candidates for the governorship. As votes continue to be counted, it appears the upcoming election will likely present voters with a choice between three candidates: Xavier Becerra, Steve Hilton, and Tom Steyer. Becerra, a former Health and Human Services secretary under President Biden, has not impressed many. Hilton, a Republican and former Fox News host, holds President Trump’s endorsement. Meanwhile, billionaire Tom Steyer has invested heavily in his campaign, aligning with various progressive groups.
The question arises: why doesn’t this vibrant state have better candidates? The answer may lie with the voters. Many Californians acknowledge the need for change but resist the actions required to implement it. This reluctance is seen in their tolerance for protracted vote-counting processes and local policies that hinder development.
Despite underwhelming candidates, there is consensus on the housing crisis. Candidates understand the need for more housing construction, focusing on reducing costs and regulatory barriers. This awareness spans across the political spectrum, from Republicans to progressives.
Governor Gavin Newsom, who shares this consensus, has struggled to catalyze significant building projects. His challenges arise not from incompetence but from opposition at the local level. Many residents endorse housing development in principle, yet cling to local policies that obstruct it.
The population of California has declined since Newsom’s tenure began, while the national figures increased by about 4 percent. This trend could result in California losing four congressional seats following the 2030 census, reflecting the exodus to regions with more affordable housing.